Why the study?
Coarctation patients before curative reconstruction face abnormal flow patterns that could cause wall deterioration, but the effect of age at correction, valve morphology, and reobstruction on PWV and WSS remains unclear.
Does age at correction and recurrent obstruction affect aortic pulse wave velocity and wall shear stress in adolescents with corrected aortic coarctation?
Does age at correction and recurrent obstruction affect aortic pulse wave velocity and wall shear stress in adolescents with corrected aortic coarctation?
A prolonged period of abnormal hemodynamic exposure before coarctation correction may increase aortic wall stiffening, and recurrent obstruction increases peak wall shear stress, endorsing longitudinal follow-up.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Earlier correction may limit aortic stiffening in tricuspid valve patients; hypothesis-generating for reobstruction effects on wall shear stress.
BACKGROUND: Coarctation patients before curative reconstruction are exposed to abnormal flow patterns which potentially could cause wall deterioration. This study evaluated the effect of age at correction on the pulse wave velocity (PWV) and peak wall shear stress (WSS) in adolescent patients with corrected coarctation. Effects of valve morphology and presence of reobstruction were also evaluated. METHODS: Twenty-one patients aged 13.7 ± 2.6 years (mean ± standard deviation) were included (bicuspid aortic valve, n = 14; reobstruction, n = 9). Mean age at correction was 1.0 ± 1.8 years. PWV was determined from two high-temporal through-plane phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisitions, for two segments: ascending aorta plus aortic arch and descending aorta. WSS was determined from four-dimensional flow MRI. Peak WSS over five systolic phases was determined for ascending aorta, aortic arch, and descending aorta. Significant differences were found between patients without and with reobstruction for peak WSS in the aortic arch (3.9 ± 1.3 Pa versus 6.5 ± 2.2 Pa, respectively; p = 0.003) and descending aorta (5.0 ± 1.3 Pa versus 6.7 ± 1.1 Pa, respectively; p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: A prolonged period of abnormal haemodynamic exposure may result in increased aortic wall stiffening. The increased peak WSS as results of a reobstruction possibly promotes different disease progression, which endorse longitudinal follow-up examination of corrected coarctation patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Juffermans et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: