Why the study?
Is a target INR of 1.5 to 2.5 safe and effective for preventing thromboembolism and bleeding complications in Japanese patients with mechanical mitral valves?
Is a target INR of 1.5 to 2.5 safe and effective for preventing thromboembolism and bleeding complications in Japanese patients with mechanical mitral valves?
A lower target INR of 1.5-2.5 appears safe and effective for Japanese patients with mechanical mitral valves, though those with tilting valves or without concomitant antiplatelet therapy remain at higher risk for thromboembolism.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support lower INR targets in select Japanese patients; hypothesis-generating pending randomized confirmation.
There are no guidelines for the optimal therapeutic range of anticoagulant therapy in Japanese patients with mechanical heart valves. A total of 214 patients were followed retrospectively after mitral mechanical valve replacement (mean duration of follow-up, 4.8 years; total duration of follow-up, 1,027 patient-years). The target range of the international normalized ratio (INR) for oral anticoagulation was between 1.5 and 2.5. For all patients 10,416 measurements of the INR were obtained during the follow-up period and approximately 76% of the intensity measurements were within the target range. Thromboembolism occurred in 8 patients (0.8 per 100 patient-years) and major bleeding in 5 patients (0.5 per 100 patient-years). There was no correlation between the distribution of the INR and the occurrence of thromboembolic or bleeding complications. In the univariate analysis of the various risk factors, patients who had a tilting valve or did not receive antiplatelet therapy had an increased risk of thromboembolism. However, there were no risk factors with respect to bleeding complications. A target range of 1.5 to 2.5 INR appears to be the optimal range and is safe for thromboembolism or bleeding complications. Thromboembolism may be reduced by additional antiplatelet therapy, and a tilting valve needs more intense anticoagulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsuyama et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: