Why the study?
Few studies in Asian populations have investigated the safety of warfarin after bioprosthetic valve replacement, leaving the optimal INR range unclear.
Is a low international normalized ratio (INR) target associated with a low complication rate among Asian patients who underwent bioprosthetic valve replacement?
Is a low international normalized ratio (INR) target associated with a low complication rate among Asian patients who underwent bioprosthetic valve replacement?
Among Asian patients who underwent bioprosthetic valve replacement, a lower INR target (1.5 to 2.5) is associated with low bleeding risk without an increase in thromboembolic events, suggesting a lower target than current ACC/AHA guidelines.
May support lower INR targets in Asian bioprosthetic valve patients; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
An inadequate number of studies focused on Asian populations have investigated the safety of warfarin usage among Asian patients with tissue valve aortic valve replacement (AVR) or mitral valve replacement (MVR). This study aimed to identify the optimal international normalized ratio (INR) range for Asian patients during a 1-year follow-up after tissue valve replacement. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent tissue valve AVR, MVR, and double valve replacement (DVR) between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2018. Data were sourced from the Chang Gung Research Database, an electronic structured medical database covering 4 regional hospitals and 3 medical centers. The exposure of interest was INR level. The outcomes of primary and secondary interest were composite thromboembolic events and bleeding events during the 1-year follow-up, respectively. The relationship between INR level and the risk of thromboembolic events was explored using a logistic regression model in which the INR value was treated as a flexible restricted cubic spline. Because having atrial fibrillation (AF) greatly would greatly affect the INR control result, the analysis was stratified by AF status. A total of 1059 participants were eligible for this study. The mean patient age was 65.5 (11.9) years; 592 (55.9%) participants were men, and 467 (44.1%) were women. A total of 447 had AF and 612 did not. The lowest bleeding risk was observed at an INR level around 1.9 to 2.0. An INR level of 1.84 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36–0.67) and 1.7 (HR, 0.78; 95% CI: 0.62–0.99) corresponded to the lowest risk of thromboembolic events in patients with pre-existing AF and those without, respectively. The INR level corresponding to the lowest risk of thromboembolic events was approximately 1.7 in patients without AF but with MVR, DVR, or isolated AVR. For patients who underwent tissue valve replacement, the bleeding risk was elevated when the INR was greater than 2.0, but the risk of thromboembolic event increased only when the INR was lower than 1.84 in the AF group and 1.7 in the non-AF group, regardless of whether the patient received AVR, MVR, or DVR. Question: Is a low international normalized ratio (INR) target associated with a low complication rate among Asian patients who underwent bioprosthetic valve replacement?. Findings: One thousand fifty-nine patients with tissue valve replacement were recruited for this study. During the 12-month follow-up, a total of 5480 INR records were generated. We correlated complication events such as bleeding and thromboembolism with each INR level to analyze complication rates. In patients with or without atrial fibrillation, both aortic and mitral valve replacement cohorts exhibited the lowest complication rates as evident in an INR range of 1.5 to 2.5, which is below the recommended threshold in the current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines. Meaning: Among the Asian population who underwent bioprosthetic valve replacement, a low INR target was associated with low bleeding risk without an increase in the thromboembolic event rate. Tweet: For the Asian population, during the 12 months after bioprosthetic valve replacement, the preferred INR target is recommended to be 0.5 lower than that suggested in the current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: