Why the study?
Are baseline adiponectin levels or lipid markers associated with secondary CVD events in patients with incident CHD?
Are baseline adiponectin levels or lipid markers associated with secondary CVD events in patients with incident CHD?
Atherogenic dyslipidemia, but not adiponectin levels, is a strong predictor of secondary CVD events in patients with incident CHD, reinforcing the importance of lipid management in secondary prevention.
Supports lipid focus in secondary CHD prevention; leaves open adiponectin's incremental prognostic value beyond lipids.
AIMS: Adiponectin is closely related to atherogenic dyslipidaemia and may be a clinical important mediator of recurrent coronary heart disease (CHD). However, studies with emphasis on secondary disease prevention are rare. We report data from a prospective study investigating the prognostic value of adiponectin, its high-molecular weight (HMW) form, and of markers of lipid metabolism in patients after their first acute CHD event. METHODS AND RESULTS: We measured baseline total- and HMW-adiponectin in 1051 patients aged 30-70 years with incident CHD and a prospective follow-up was conducted [median: 56.6 months (interquartile range: 53.2; 57.5)]. During this period, 95 patients (incidence: 22.3/1000 patient years) experienced a secondary cardiovascular disease (CVD) event. After adjustment by Cox proportional hazard models, neither total- nor HMW-adiponectin was associated with secondary CVD events. In contrast, LDL-cholesterol and markers of atherogenic dyslipidaemia were independently associated with secondary CVD events (relative risk per unit increase: LDL-cholesterol: 1.54; 95%CI 1.18-2.01; P = 0.001, triglycerides: 1.58; 95%CI 1.31-1.90; P < 0.0001 and HDL-cholesterol: 0.34; 95%CI 0.14-0.79; P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Measurement of total- and HMW-adiponectin may add no significant value to risk stratifications in patients with incident CHD. In contrast, approaching atherogenic dyslipidaemia may represent a promising target in secondary prevention programs for high-risk patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eynatten et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More on Coronary artery diseaseMore from European Heart Journal