Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of digoxin on oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR) model and compare the results with bevacizumab treatment.Methods: Twenty-eight newborn Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into four groups:control group, normoxia+intraperitoneal (ip) normal saline (NS); OIR group, OIR+ip NS; OIR+digoxin group, OIR+ip 0.1 mg/kg of digoxin; and OIR+bevacizumab group, OIR+ip 2.5 mg/kg of bevacizumab.The rats were exposed to 50% oxygen for 24 h, followed by 10% oxygen for 24 h, to induce OIR.This cycle was repeated seven times until 14 days postnatal (P).In all groups, single-dose injections were administered on P15 th day.Histopathological and immunohistochemical examinations were performed at the end of the study.Results: The mean neovascular cell nuclei counts (NVCN) of the four groups were 9.00±3.16,41.80±11.44,19.38±2.20,and 16.00±2.62.The mean NVCN count was significantly reduced in the treatment groups compared to the OIR group (p<0.001).The mean NVCN count was similar between the treatment groups (p=0.078).In immunohistochemical staining, the immunoreactivity values of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were 0.01±0.00,1.65±0.30,0.09±0.08,and 0.04±0.02,and the tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) values were 0.10±0.00,1.12±0.18,0.18±0.13,and 0.14±0.05.In the OIR group, VEGF and TNF-α immunoreactivity increased markedly compared to the control group (p<0.001).VEGF and TNF-α immunoreactivity of the treatment groups decreased significantly compared to the OIR group (p<0.001).VEGF and TNF-α immunoreactivity were similar between the treatment groups (VEGF:p=0.752;TNF-α:p=0.099).Conclusions: Retinal neovascularization was significantly suppressed by digoxin treatment, and this effect was comparable to bevacizumab in the OIR model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Balbaba et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 6 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: