Why the study?
Does in vivo gene delivery of HSP70i improve contractile recovery following ischemia-reperfusion in mouse hearts?
Does in vivo gene delivery of HSP70i improve contractile recovery following ischemia-reperfusion in mouse hearts?
Viral vector-mediated delivery of HSP70i preserves cardiac contractile function following ischemia-reperfusion injury in a mouse model, demonstrating potential as a therapeutic intervention.
Supports HSP70i gene therapy exploration in murine ischemia-reperfusion; leaves open clinical translation from animal models.
Inducible heat shock protein 70 (HSP70i) has been shown to exert a protective effect in hearts subjected to ischemia-reperfusion. Although studied in heat-shocked animals and in transgenic mice that constitutively overexpress the protein, the therapeutic application of the protein in the form of a viral vector-mediated HSP70i expression has not been widely examined. Accordingly, we have examined the effects of HSP70i delivered in vivo to the left ventricular free wall of the heart via viral gene therapy in mice. The affect of virally mediated HSP70i expression in preserving cardiac function following ischemia-reperfusion was examined after short-term expression (5-day adenovirus mediated) and long-term expression (8-mo adeno-associated virus mediated) in mice by subjecting ex vivo Langendorff perfused hearts to a regime of ischemia-reperfusion. Both vectors were capable of increasing HSP70i expression in the heart, and neither vector had any effect on cardiac function during aerobic (preischemic) perfusion when compared with corresponding controls. In contrast, both adenovirus-mediated and adeno-associated virus-mediated expression of HSP70i improved the contractile recovery of the heart after 120 min of reperfusion following ischemia. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using both short- and long-term expression of virally mediated HSP70i as a therapeutic intervention against cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Belke et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: