Adeno-associated virus vectors can achieve safe, stable, long-term myocardial gene transfer via standard percutaneous coronary infusion in a large mammalian model.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports durable percutaneous AAV myocardial gene transfer in large animals without toxicity; leaves open human translation pending clinical trials.
BACKGROUND: Viral vector-mediated gene transfer into the heart represents a potentially powerful tool for studying both cardiac physiology as well as gene therapy of cardiac disease. We report here the use of a defective viral vector, which expresses no viral gene products, for gene transfer into the mammalian heart. Previous studies have used recombinant viral vectors, which retained viral genes and yielded mostly short-term expression, often with significant inflammation. METHODS: An adeno-associated virus vector was used that contains no viral genes and is completely free of contaminating helper viruses. The adeno-associated virus vector was applied to rat hearts by direct intramuscular injection; adeno-associated virus was also infused into pig hearts in vivo via percutaneous intraarterial infusion into the coronary vasculature using routine catheterization techniques. RESULTS: Gene transfer into rat heart yielded no apparent inflammation, and expression was observed for at least 2 months after injection. Infusion into pig circumflex coronary arteries resulted in successful transfer and expression of the reporter gene in cardiac myocytes without apparent toxicity or inflammation; gene expression was observed for at least 6 months after infusion. CONCLUSIONS: We report the use of adeno-associated virus vectors in the cardiovascular system as well as successful myocardial gene transfer after percutaneous coronary artery infusion of viral vectors in a large, clinically relevant mammalian model. These results suggest that safe and stable gene transfer can be achieved in the heart using standard outpatient cardiac catheterization techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaplitt et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: