Why the study?
Does fractional change in blood volume following normal saline infusion identify patients at risk for adverse outcomes before noncardiac surgery?
Does fractional change in blood volume following normal saline infusion identify patients at risk for adverse outcomes before noncardiac surgery?
Fractional change in blood volume following a normal saline infusion may be a better predictor of adverse outcomes than standard hemodynamic data in high-risk patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fractional blood volume change after saline may better identify perioperative risk than hemodynamics; leaves open its value for preoperative optimization in noncardiac surgery.
Patients with multiple-system disease were considered to be at high-risk to develop cardiac complications when undergoing an elective noncardiac surgical procedure. Their operative risk was prospectively assessed by a protocol that included recording the presence of established clinical risk factors and measuring the hemodynamic response to an intravenous infusion of up to 2 L of normal saline given over a two-hour period. The day prior to their operations, 126 patients were admitted to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit, where pulmonary artery catheters were inserted without serious complications. One hundred and eleven patients tolerated the entire 2-L infusion. The hemoglobin concentration of blood was measured before and after the infusion. The fractional change in blood volume (BV after/BV before) calculated with hemoglobin data was 1.06 +/- 0.06 (mean +/- SD). A multivarient discriminant analysis showed that the fractional change in blood volume was a covariant with a higher correlation rank than the hemodynamic data in identifying patients at risk for an adverse outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mullins et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: