Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Operando characterization reveals rate-dependent lithium plating and dead lithium formation in anode-free batteries, indicating optimal cycling stability at intermediate charging rates.
Anode‐free lithium metal batteries (AFLMBs) represent a promising pathway toward high‐energy‐density storage systems. However, their cycling lifetime is fundamentally constrained by uncontrolled spatial distribution of lithium and loss of active lithium during plating and stripping. This study employed a vacuum‐compatible operando neutron depth profiling (NDP) cell based on a liquid‐electrolyte anode‐free Cu||Li 1.2 Ni 0.13 Co 0.13 Mn 0.54 O 2 full cell to quantitatively track the depth‐resolved evolution of Li plating and stripping under varied charging rates (0.2, 0.5, 1, and 2 C). Results demonstrate that charging rate critically governs lithium nucleation sites and spatial distribution: at 0.2 C, sparse nucleation sites promote lithium growth toward the electrolyte; high rates (1 and 2 C) yield loose mossy deposits, where upper layers readily lose electrical contact during stripping, forming “dead lithium.” In contrast, 0.5 C provides a favorable balance between electrical connectivity during stripping and deposit structural stability, leading to relatively optimal cycling performance among the investigated rates. This work systematically elucidates how charging rate modulates lithium plating and stripping dynamics, providing direct, quantitative experimental evidence to guide rational design of cycling protocols for AFLMBs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: