Key result
Immunization with the ASFV-989 strain, either intramuscularly or oronasally, provided full clinical protection and prevented viremia in pigs challenged with the Georgia strain.
Why the study?
African swine fever causes high mortality in suids, making vaccine development a priority given its current spread.
Does immunization with the thermo-attenuated ASFV-989 strain provide clinical protection against Georgia 2007/1 challenge in SPF pigs?
Does immunization with the thermo-attenuated ASFV-989 strain provide clinical protection against Georgia 2007/1 challenge in SPF pigs?
The thermo-attenuated ASFV-989 strain is a promising non-GMO vaccine candidate that provides full clinical protection against the Georgia 2007/1 strain in pigs.
African swine fever (ASF) is a contagious viral disease of suids that induces high mortality in domestic pigs and wild boars. Given the current spread of ASF, the development of a vaccine is a priority. During an attempt to inactivate the Georgia 2007/1 strain via heat treatment, we fortuitously generated an attenuated strain called ASFV-989. Compared to Georgia, the ASFV-989 strain genome has a deletion of 7458 nucleotides located in the 5′-end encoding region of MGF 505/360, which allowed for developing a DIVA PCR system. In vitro, in porcine alveolar macrophages, the replication kinetics of the ASFV-989 and Georgia strains were identical. In vivo, specific-pathogen-free (SPF) pigs inoculated with the ASFV-989 strain, either intramuscularly or oronasally, exhibited transient hyperthermia and slightly decreased growth performance. Animals immunized with the ASFV-989 strain showed viremia 100 to 1000 times lower than those inoculated with the Georgia strain and developed a rapid antibody and cell-mediated response. In ASFV-989-immunized pigs challenged 2 or 4 weeks later with the Georgia strain, no symptoms were recorded and no viremia for the challenge strain was detected. These results show that the ASFV-989 strain is a promising non-GMO vaccine candidate that is usable either intramuscularly or oronasally.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bourry et al. (2022) studied African swine fever (ASF). ASFV-989 strain immunization vs. Georgia strain was evaluated on Clinical symptoms and viremia after challenge. Immunization with the ASFV-989 strain, either intramuscularly or oronasally, provided full clinical protection and prevented viremia in pigs challenged with the Georgia strain.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: