Key result
Symmetrical implantation of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve relative to the ascending aorta curvature exhibited the smallest leaflet motion asymmetry and lowest rebound during closure.
Why the study?
Does the implantation orientation of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve affect leaflet motion and hemodynamics in an anatomic aorta?
Does the implantation orientation of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve affect leaflet motion and hemodynamics in an anatomic aorta?
Symmetrical implantation of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve relative to the ascending aorta curvature minimizes leaflet motion asymmetry and rebound, potentially reducing the risk of intermittent regurgitation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May guide orientation choices to lessen leaflet asymmetry; leaves open whether benefits translate to reduced complications in patients.
We carry out three-dimensional high-resolution numerical simulations of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve under physiologic pulsatile flow conditions implanted at different orientations in an anatomic aorta obtained from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of a volunteer. We use the extensively validated for heart valve flow curvilinear-immersed boundary (CURVIB) fluid-structure interaction (FSI) solver in which the empty aorta is discretized with a curvilinear, aorta-conforming grid while the valve is handled as an immersed boundary. The motion of the valve leaflets are calculated through a strongly coupled FSI algorithm implemented in conjunction with the Aitken convergence acceleration technique. We perform simulations for three valve orientations, which differ from each other by 45 deg and compare the results in terms of leaflet motion and flow field. We show that the valve implanted symmetrically relative to the symmetry plane of the ascending aorta curvature exhibits the smallest overall asymmetry in the motion of its two leaflets and lowest rebound during closure. Consequently, we hypothesize that this orientation is beneficial to reduce the chance of intermittent regurgitation. Furthermore, we find that the valve orientation does not significantly affect the shear stress distribution in the aortic lumen, which is in agreement with previous studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Borazjani et al. (2010) studied this question. Symmetrical implantation orientation of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve vs. Other orientations differing by 45 degrees was evaluated on Leaflet motion asymmetry, rebound during closure, and shear stress distribution. Symmetrical implantation of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve relative to the ascending aorta curvature exhibited the smallest leaflet motion asymmetry and lowest rebound during closure.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: