Why the study?
Does an implantable Doppler probe accurately measure cardiac output compared to thermodilution in patients post-open-heart surgery?
Does an implantable Doppler probe accurately measure cardiac output compared to thermodilution in patients post-open-heart surgery?
An implantable Doppler probe offers a safe and accurate method for continuous postoperative cardiac output monitoring compared to standard thermodilution.
May support continuous cardiac output monitoring post-open-heart surgery; leaves open validation in larger prospective studies.
The authors evolved a Doppler probe which can be attached to the ascending aorta intraoperatively. Using a pulsed echo Doppler flowmeter operating at 2 mHz, cardiac output was continuously measured during the first 2 days after open-heart surgery in 20 patients. The internal diameter of the aorta was assessed with ultrasound echo technique. The probe was fixed to the ascending aorta with a double suture through the adventitia. The suture was tightened by means of a long tourniquet which was passed through an infraxiphoid skin incision, between the two chest drains. A stable position providing adequate signals was achieved by use of probes with stabilizing "side flaps". In 8 cases the method was compared with the thermodilution technique using Swan-Ganz catheters. Analysis of 44 simultaneously performed measurements revealed a highly significant correlation between the two methods, and the results remained comparable throughout the 48-hour test period. There were no complications and all the probes could be easily removed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Svennevig et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: