Why the study?
Does rapid infusion of bidisomide improve acute tolerability compared to disopyramide in normal and post-MI dogs?
Does rapid infusion of bidisomide improve acute tolerability compared to disopyramide in normal and post-MI dogs?
Rapid infusion of bidisomide is well tolerated and antiarrhythmic in dogs, whereas rapid infusion of disopyramide is potentially lethal, particularly post-myocardial infarction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Bidisomide shows superior acute tolerability versus disopyramide in post-MI dogs; leaves open translation to human arrhythmia management.
The acute tolerability of rapid infusions of bidisomide or disopyramide was evaluated in normal conscious dogs and in conscious dogs 48 h after the creation of myocardial infarctions (MIs). Both drugs were given in total doses of 15 mg/kg (1.5 x the canine antiarrhythmic dose for each drug). Bidisomide was well tolerated at infusion rates of 3, 5, 11, and 15 mg/kg/min by normal dogs. Disopyramide was well tolerated, except for anticholinergic effects, by normal dogs given infusions at rates of 1.5 and 3 mg/kg/min. Disopyramide caused a ventricular arrhythmia at 4.5 mg/kg/min in one dog, however. Bidisomide (15 mg/kg/min) was well tolerated and antiarrhythmic in dogs with infarctions. Disopyramide (3 and 4.5 mg/kg/min) was lethal in dogs that had myocardial infarctions. A 1 mg/kg/min infusion rate of disopyramide was antiarrhythmic and well tolerated, except for anticholinergic effects, in the post-MI dogs. Both drugs prolonged the ECG lead II P duration, PR interval (bidisomide more so than disopyramide), and QRS duration. Both bidisomide and disopyramide shifted the mean electrical axis of the QRS complex from a right axis deviation to the normal range in dogs with infarctions. The data indicated that the desired cardiac electropharmacologic effects of bidisomide can be achieved in a 1 min infusion. Normal dogs, and especially dogs with infarctions, revealed the potential hazards of rapidly infusing disopyramide.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schmidt et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: