Impaired cardiopulmonary vagal reflex control of heart rate in normal aging can be ameliorated by ANP infusion or chronic neutral endopeptidase inhibition in a rat model.
May support ANP modulation for age-related vagal impairment in rats; hypothesis-generating, requires human studies before any clinical consideration.
Arterial baroreflex function diminishes with age, but whether cardiopulmonary vagal reflexes are similarly altered with physiological aging has not been fully elucidated. In this study, predominantly cardiac high pressure mechanoreceptor-activated (ramp baroreflex) and cardiopulmonary chemoreceptor-activated (von Bezold-Jarisch reflex) vagal reflexes in conscious, instrumented rats were impaired by 30% to 40% (P<0.05) in 24-month-old (n=12) compared with 6-month-old rats (n=12). To determine whether this is a restorable deficit, the influence of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), either by infusion or blockade of its breakdown, was studied. ANP infusion was previously shown to enhance Bezold-Jarisch reflex and ramp baroreflex bradycardia in young adult rats. The present study confirmed that vagal reflex augmentation by ANP (50 pmol/kg per minute) also occurs in old rats (increased by 60+/-18% (Bezold-Jarisch reflex) and 91+/-15% (ramp baroreflex; P<0.05). Direct vagal stimulation in anesthetized animals showed that the target for ANP was not the cardiac vagus itself in old rats (n=7), although in young rats only, we confirmed the published finding that ANP enhances vagal bradycardia (by 58+/-14%, n=7). Neutral endopeptidase 24.11 degrades ANP and several other peptides. The neutral endopeptidase inhibitor candoxatrilat (5 mg/kg per day IV for 7 to 9 days) restored vagal reflex bradycardia in old rats (n=6) to levels similar to those in young neutral endopeptidase inhibitor-treated rats (n=6). Impaired cardiopulmonary vagal reflex control of heart rate is thus a feature of normal aging, and this deficit may be ameliorated by either ANP infusion or chronic neutral endopeptidase inhibition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: