Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/antimony‐doped tin oxide (ATO) nanocomposites were prepared by in situ polymerization. The nonisothermal crystallization behaviors of neat PET and PET/ATO nanocomposites were investigated with differential scanning calorimetry. The nonisothermal crystallization data were analyzed with the Avrami analysis modified by Jeziorny, the Ozawa method, and a method developed by Liu et al. The modified Avrami equation could describe only the primary stage of nonisothermal crystallization of PET and PET/ATO nanocomposites. The Ozawa analysis, when applied to the polymer systems studied here, failed to describe their nonisothermal crystallization behavior. The kinetic method developed by Liu et al. was successful in describing the nonisothermal crystallization of neat PET and PET/ATO nanocomposites. According to the Kissinger equation, the activation energies were determined to be −205.3, −220.0, and −243.7 kJ/mol for neat PET and 99/1 and 95/5 PET/ATO nanocomposites, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: