Why the study?
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in the United States, and people living with HIV face a higher risk of developing it.
Do nonpharmacological behavioral and lifestyle interventions prevent cardiovascular disease in persons living with HIV?
Do nonpharmacological behavioral and lifestyle interventions prevent cardiovascular disease in persons living with HIV?
There is an increasing emphasis on nonpharmacological behavioral interventions to reduce cardiovascular risk in people living with HIV, though current literature lacks geographic and population diversity.
Behavioral interventions show promise for CVD prevention in HIV; leaves open questions on efficacy and equity in underrepresented populations.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the United States, accounting for 900,000 deaths annually. People living with HIV are at a higher risk of developing CVD. We conducted a scoping review guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis. In July 2020, six databases were searched: PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Embase, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, as well as reference lists of relevant studies and key journals. Our review identified 18 studies that addressed nonpharmacological behavioral interventions into the following: physical activity (n = 6), weight loss (n = 2), dietary interventions (n = 1), and multicomponent interventions (n = 9). In the past 10 years, there has been an increased emphasis on nonpharmacological behavioral approaches, including the incorporation of multicomponent interventions, to reduce cardiovascular risk in people living with HIV. The extant literature is limited by underrepresentation of geographic regions and populations that disproportionately experience CVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramos et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: