This study provides the first evidence of an Ih-like cationic current and HCN immunoreactivity in kidney or any other nonexcitable mammalian cells.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No immediate clinical implications; extends HCN currents to nonexcitable renal cells for further validation.
The cation conductancein primary cultures of rat renal inner medullary collecting duct was studied using perforated-patch and conventional whole cell clamp techniques. Hyperpolarizations beyond -60 mV induced a time-dependent inward nonselective cationic current (I(vti)) that resembles the well-known hyperpolarization-activated, cyclic nucleotide-gated I(h) and I(f) currents. I(vti) showed a half-maximal activation around -102 mV with a slope factor of 25 mV. It had a higher conductance (but, at its reversal potential, not a higher permeability) for K(+) than for Na(+) (gK(+)/gNa(+) = 1.5), was modulated by cAMP and blocked by external Cd(2+) (but not Cs(+) or ZD-7288), and potentiated by a high extracellular K(+) concentration. We explored the expression of the I(h) channel genes (HCN1 to -4) by RT-PCR. The presence of transcripts corresponding to the HCN1, -2, and -4 genes was observed in both the cultured cells and kidney inner medulla. Western blot analysis with HCN2 antibody showed labeling of approximately 90- and approximately 120-kDa proteins in samples from inner medulla and cultured cells. Immunocytochemical analysis of cell cultures and inner medulla showed the presence of HCN immunoreactivity partially colocalized with the Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase at the basolateral membrane of collecting duct cells. This is the first evidence of an I(h)-like cationic current and HCN immunoreactivity in either kidney or any other nonexcitable mammalian cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bolívar et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: