Administration of Amiodarone During Resuscitation Is Associated with Higher Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Levels in the Early Postarrest Period in the Swine Model of Ischemic Ventricular Fibrillation

To compare the early postarrest inflammatory cytokine response between animals administered amiodarone (AMIO) and lidocaine (LIDO) intra-arrest during resuscitation from ventricular fibrillation (VF). Domestic swine (n=32) were placed under general anesthesia and instrumented before spontaneous VF was induced by balloon occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery. After 7 min of VF, standard ACLS resuscitation was performed and animals were randomized to either bolus AMIO (5 mg/kg, n=13) or LIDO (1 mg/kg, n=14) for recurrent or refractory VF. A non-antiarrhythmic (n=5) was also used for comparison. Following return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α levels were drawn at 30 and 60 min. Groups were comparable with respect to prearrest hemodynamics and resuscitation variables. In the postarrest period, the LIDO and non-antiarrhythmic group demonstrated virtually identical TNF-α response trajectories. However, TNF-α levels were significantly higher in AMIO- than LIDO-treated animals at 30 min (geometric mean 539 versus 240 pg/mL, 2.2-fold higher, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-3.8-fold higher, P=0.003) and at 60 min (geometric mean 570 versus 204 pg/mL, 2.8-fold higher, 95% CI 1.1-7.0-fold higher, P=0.03). Significant differences in the postarrest TNF-α levels were observed between animals treated with AMIO as compared to those treated with LIDO. Improved rates of ROSC seen with AMIO may come at the expense of a heightened proinflammatory state in the postcardiac arrest period.