Why the study?
Does early administration of streptokinase improve reperfusion in patients with acute coronary thrombosis?
Does early administration of streptokinase improve reperfusion in patients with acute coronary thrombosis?
Early administration of high-dose intravenous streptokinase achieves reperfusion in acute coronary thrombosis without excessive bleeding risk, and early CK peaking serves as a noninvasive marker of successful thrombolysis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Early streptokinase may support reperfusion in acute thrombosis; leaves open confirmation of benefit and safety in larger randomized trials.
Most important in comparison to earlier European trials, streptokinase (STK) is administered now at the earliest time possible after acute coronary thrombosis. In this series, STK was started 2.5 (+/- 1.5) h after onset of chest pain, with reperfusion achieved approximately 1 h later in 6 (55%) of 11 patients treated. Posttreatment angiograms will not be required to identify thrombolysis if noninvasive indicators will provide this information correctly. Early creatine kinase enzyme peaking 8 to 15 h after chest pain appears to be the most accurate marker available. Among untreated and unsuccessfully treated patients, creatine kinase peaking usually occurs 18-36 h after chest pain. A large intravenous STK loading dose of 1,500,000 IU produces a plasma concentration of approximately 500 IU/ml, equal to that concentration employed originally by intracoronary infusions. Such large doses have been employed in 60 patients thus far, without an unusual incidence or severity of hemorrhages. High dose, ultrashort-term treatment for only 1 h is being investigated now. Systemic STK penetrates most "blind coronary pouches" and gains access to acute thrombi, as identified by radiocontrast material washout during angiography in patients with severe coronary occlusions. Streptokinase exerts a significant anticoagulant effect, not previous considered, which may be beneficial in the prevention of new clot formation and the rapid dissolution of acute coronary thrombi.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John A. Udall (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: