Experimental and simulation study demonstrates optimized aggregate gradation enhances stability in rubberized asphalt dam facings, indicating superior load transfer and seepage resistance.
Conventional gradation design for hydraulic asphalt concrete does not explicitly control coarse-aggregate skeleton formation and internal load-transfer paths, limiting the coordinated optimization of multiple performance requirements for dam facings. To address this limitation, a two-stage mesostructure-informed gradation design method integrating Particle Flow Code (PFC) simulation, X-ray computed tomography (CT) characterization, and systematic performance tests was developed. PFC was first used to optimal coarse-to-fine aggregate ratio based on particle packing and force-chain uniformity, followed by CT-based optimization of the internal coarse-aggregate fractions through contact characteristics, spatial uniformity, and compaction orientation. The results show that a 70:30 coarse-to-fine aggregate ratio achieves the densest packing and the most uniform force-chain distribution.Compared with the specification-recommended hydraulic asphalt concrete gradation, the optimized gradation reduces the strength contribution of mortar-mortar contacts by 21.62% and increases that of aggregate-mortar contacts by 65.63%, reconstructing the internal load transfer network from mortar-dominated bearing to aggregate-mortar collaborative bearing. A 3:1 mass ratio (G2 gradation) of 13.2–9.5 mm to 9.5–4.75 mm aggregates produced the most favorable mesostructure. The G2 gradation increased residual Marshall stability and low-temperature flexural failure strain by 3.75% and 4.56%, respectively, while reducing the 70 °C slope-flow value by 17.84%. These findings confirm that rationally designing mixture gradation based on quantifiable mesostructural parameters can provide a replicable reference for the proportion design of hydraulic asphalt mixtures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: