Key result
Carotid stenting significantly reduced the peak flow ratio of the external to internal carotid artery from 0.6689 to approximately 0.14, while increasing local flow disturbances such as oscillating shear index and relative residence time.
Why the study?
Carotid stenting near the bifurcation carina is clinically linked to adverse events like in-stent restenosis, thrombosis, and side branch occlusion, but the potential biomechanical mechanisms remain unclear.
Does simulated carotid stenting alter local hemodynamics (WSS, OSI, RRT) in the carotid bifurcation compared to an unstented stenotic model?
Does simulated carotid stenting alter local hemodynamics (WSS, OSI, RRT) in the carotid bifurcation compared to an unstented stenotic model?
Computational modeling suggests that carotid stenting significantly alters local hemodynamics, reducing flow to the external carotid artery and increasing flow disturbances that may predispose to restenosis and thrombosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May increase restenosis risk after stenting; leaves open validation in clinical trials.
Carotid stenting near the bifurcation carina is associated with adverse events, especially in-stent restenosis, in-stent thrombosis, and side branch occlusion in clinical data. This study aims to determine the potential biomechanical mechanisms for these adverse events after carotid stenting. The patient-specific carotid models were constructed with different stenting scenarios to study the flow distribution and hemodynamic parameters, such as wall shear stress (WSS), flow velocity, relative residence time (RRT), and oscillating shear index (OSI) in the carotid bifurcation. The results suggested that existing stent obviously reduced blood flow to external carotid artery (ECA) but enhanced local flow disturbance both in ECA and stented internal carotid artery (ICA), and the inner-posterior wall of stented ICA and the outer-posterior wall of ECA might endure a relatively low level of WSS and remarkably elevated OSI and RRT. In addition, the implanted stent leads to more ECA adverse flow than stented ICA. While disturbed flow in the vicinity of strut increased as stent length increased, blood flow and areas of local flow disturbance in ECA slightly decreased as stent length increased. In conclusion, the results revealed that ECA might be in relatively high levels of abnormal local hemodynamics after stenting, followed by stented ICA, leading to potential adverse events after interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fan et al. (2021) studied Carotid bifurcation stenosis (n=1). Carotid stenting (short, medium, and long stents) vs. Unstented model with stenosis was evaluated on Hemodynamic parameters including wall shear stress (WSS), oscillating shear index (OSI), relative residence time (RRT), and flow distribution. Carotid stenting significantly reduced the peak flow ratio of the external to internal carotid artery from 0.6689 to approximately 0.14, while increasing local flow disturbances such as oscillating shear index and relative residence time.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: