Key result
Longitudinal changes in the PRECISE-DAPT score were investigated for prognostic implications, but the abstract reports no quantitative results.
Why the study?
The PRECISE-DAPT score is calculated at baseline, but its laboratory determinants might change over time, leaving the prognostic implications of score changes during follow-up unknown.
Do longitudinal changes in PRECISE-DAPT score predict outcomes in patients on DAPT after PCI?
Cohort
Yes
Do longitudinal changes in PRECISE-DAPT score predict outcomes in patients on DAPT after PCI?
Longitudinal PRECISE-DAPT changes lack quantified prognostic data; leaves open their utility for DAPT decisions after PCI.
Dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneouscoronary intervention (PCI) reduces ischaemic events but increases bleeding risk, which in turn is associated with critical adverse events.1–3 Assessment of the PRECISE-DAPT (Predicting Bleeding Complications in Patients Undergoing Stent Implantation and Subsequent Dual Anti Platelet Therapy)4 is currently recommended to predict long-term bleeding risk in PCI on DAPT.5 We hypothesized that the PRECISEDAPT score, which is calculated using baseline risk factors, does not remain static, as its determinants, that is, creatinine clearance, haemoglobin, whiteblood- cell count, might vary with time. Accordingly, we sought to investigate the possible prognostic implications of changes in PRECISE-DAPT score over follow-up
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pelliccia et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Patients on dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention. Longitudinal changes in PRECISE-DAPT score was evaluated. Longitudinal changes in the PRECISE-DAPT score were investigated for prognostic implications, but the abstract reports no quantitative results.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: