Key result
Trandolapril/verapamil-SR significantly improved 2-h OGTT glucose compared to losartan/hydrochlorothiazide (-0.21 vs +1.44 mmol/l; P<0.001) in hypertensive patients with impaired glucose tolerance.
Why the study?
Does a fixed-dose combination of trandolapril/verapamil-SR improve glucose tolerance compared to losartan/hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive patients with impaired glucose tolerance?
RCT (n=240)
Open-label, blinded-endpoints
randomized
Does a fixed-dose combination of trandolapril/verapamil-SR improve glucose tolerance compared to losartan/hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive patients with impaired glucose tolerance?
Absolute Event Rate: -0.21% vs 1.44%
p-value: p=< 0.001
In hypertensive patients with impaired glucose tolerance, a trandolapril/verapamil-SR combination improves glucose tolerance and reduces the risk of new-onset diabetes compared to a losartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination.
Trandolapril/verapamil-SR may be preferred over losartan/hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive IGT patients; extends evidence for ACEI/CCB metabolic benefits.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to test the hypothesis that a fixed-dose combination of trandolapril/verapamil-SR (T/V) is superior to a fixed-dose combination of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide (L/H) on glucose tolerance in hypertensive patients with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-end points design was used to assess the effects of a T/V versus L/H combination in patients with IGT and hypertension (n = 240) followed for up to 1 year. Doses were titrated to a systolic blood pressure <130 mmHg. Primary outcome was change from baseline in a 2-h glucose on oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at study end (mean [+/-SD] at follow-up, 46.9 +/- 13.5 weeks). Secondary outcomes included changes in insulin sensitivity, office and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure, incidence of new-onset diabetes, lipids, and inflammatory markers. Data are expressed as means +/- SE unless otherwise noted. RESULTS: Changes at study end were noted in 2-h OGTT glucose (T/V -0.21 +/- 0.36 vs. L/H +1.44 +/- 0.36 mmol/l; P < 0.001) and insulin level (-30.13 +/- 38.38 vs. +84.86 +/- 38.33 pmol/l, respectively; P = 0.025). Worsening of insulin resistance occurred by week 12 (T/V 0.000 +/- 0.001 vs. L/H -0.005 +/- 0.001; P = 0.016). A higher incidence of new-onset diabetes (T/V 11.0 vs. L/H 26.6%; P = 0.002) and HbA1c >7% (2.6 vs. 9.6%, respectively; P = 0.05) occurred at study end. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with IGT, normal kidney function, and hypertension, the fixed-dose combination of T/V reduces the risk of new-onset diabetes compared with an L/H-based therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bakris et al. (2006) conducted an RCT in Impaired glucose tolerance and hypertension (n=240). Trandolapril/verapamil-SR vs. Losartan/hydrochlorothiazide was evaluated on Change from baseline in a 2-h glucose on oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at study end (p=< 0.001). Trandolapril/verapamil-SR significantly improved 2-h OGTT glucose compared to losartan/hydrochlorothiazide (-0.21 vs +1.44 mmol/l; P<0.001) in hypertensive patients with impaired glucose tolerance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: