Key result
Asymmetry of carotid artery wall thickness was significantly higher in symptomatic patients (P=0.0001) and independently associated with cerebrovascular symptoms (P=0.0108).
Why the study?
Is asymmetry of carotid artery wall thickness (ACAWT) measured by MDCTA associated with cerebrovascular symptoms?
Case-Control (n=120)
Is asymmetry of carotid artery wall thickness (ACAWT) measured by MDCTA associated with cerebrovascular symptoms?
p-value: p=0.0001
Asymmetry in carotid artery wall thickness measured by CT angiography is independently associated with cerebrovascular symptoms and may help stratify risk.
ACAWT asymmetry may aid cerebrovascular risk stratification; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
PURPOSE: Previous publications demonstrated that multi-detector-row computed tomography Angiography (MDCTA) can evaluate the carotid artery wall thickness (CAWT). The purpose of this work was to compare the asymmetry of CAWT between carotids in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty consecutive symptomatic (males 44; median age 64) and 60 asymptomatic sex- and age-matched patients were analysed by using a 40-detector-row CT system. CAWT was calculated for both carotids in each patient and the ratio between the thicker CAWT and the contra-lateral was calculated to obtain the ACAWT index. Bland-Altman, logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were calculated. RESULTS: The Bland-Altman plot demonstrates a very good agreement between measurements with a mean difference value of 3.4% and 95% CI from -8% to 14.8%. The ACAWT was significantly different between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (with a p value of 0.0001). The ROC area under the curve was 0.742 (p = 0.001). Logistic regression model indicated that ACAWT, CAWT, stenosis degree, and fatty plaques were independent variables associated with cerebrovascular symptoms (p value, respectively, 0.0108, 0.0231, 0.0002, and 0.013). CONCLUSION: Results of our study indicated that the index of asymmetry in the CAWT might be used as a further parameter to stratify the risk of symptoms related to carotid artery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saba et al. (2014) conducted a case-control in Cerebrovascular symptoms (n=120). Asymmetry of carotid artery wall thickness (ACAWT) vs. Symmetric carotid artery wall thickness / Asymptomatic patients was evaluated on Cerebrovascular symptoms (p=0.0001). Asymmetry of carotid artery wall thickness was significantly higher in symptomatic patients (P=0.0001) and independently associated with cerebrovascular symptoms (P=0.0108).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: