Key result
Semiautomated ultrasonography demonstrated good agreement with multidetector-row computed tomography angiography in measuring carotid artery wall thickness (r=0.9250-0.9466; P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Does multidetector-row computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) agree with semiautomated ultrasonography (SA-US) for evaluating carotid wall thickness in adult patients?
Observational (n=21)
Does multidetector-row computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) agree with semiautomated ultrasonography (SA-US) for evaluating carotid wall thickness in adult patients?
Effect estimate: r 0.9250 (95% CI 0.864-0.959)
p-value: p=<0.0001
MDCTA and semiautomated ultrasonography demonstrate good agreement in measuring carotid artery wall thickness, suggesting both modalities are reliable for this assessment.
May support semiautomated ultrasonography as MDCTA alternative; leaves open outcome validation.
Purpose The increased thickness of the carotid artery is associated with the development of coronary and cerebrovascular events. In this study our purpose was to evaluate the carotid artery wall thickness (CAWT) by using multidetector-row computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) and the intima media thickness (IMT) by using semiautomated ultrasonography (SA-US) to evaluate the agreement between the two methods. Methods This is a retrospective study, and the institutional review board approval was obtained. Twenty-one patients (age range, 59–81 years) were analyzed with the use of a 16-detector row CT and a sonographic scanner. In total, 14 subjects had shown cerebral ischemic symptoms. The IMT was quantified by the use of specific semiautomated software (ImgTracer ™ , Global Biomedical Technologies, Roseville, CA) by four expert observers, and the CAWT was measured by use of the MDCTA. Data were compared with the Wilcoxon test for paired samples. Bland–Altman statistics was used to measure the agreement between MDCTA and SA-US. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results Forty-two carotids were analyzed, and the CAWT ranged from 0.64 to 2.99 mm, with a mean value of 1.438 mm. By analyzing the Bland–Altman plots, we observed a good agreement between SA-US and correlation coefficient r were 0.9250 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.864–0.959; p < 0.0001), 0.9265 (95% CI 0.866–0.961; p < 0.0001), 0.9466 (95% CI 0.902–0.971; p < 0.0001), and 0.8621 (95% CI: 0.756–0.924; p < 0.0001) for observer 1, observer 2, observer 3 and observer 4 respectively. Conclusions Data of this preliminary study by using SA-US and MDCTA demonstrated a good agreement between in the measurement of CAWT and IMT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saba et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Increased carotid artery wall thickness (n=21). Semiautomated ultrasonography (SA-US) vs. Multidetector-row computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) was evaluated on Agreement between MDCTA and SA-US for measuring carotid artery wall thickness and intima media thickness (r 0.9250, 95% CI 0.864-0.959, p=<0.0001). Semiautomated ultrasonography demonstrated good agreement with multidetector-row computed tomography angiography in measuring carotid artery wall thickness (r=0.9250-0.9466; P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: