Key result
Multidetector row computed tomography angiography showed excellent agreement with color Doppler ultrasound for measuring carotid artery thickness (Pearson r 0.9997; 95% CI 0.9996-0.9998; p<0.01).
Why the study?
Does multidetector row computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) agree with color Doppler ultrasound (CD-US) in measuring carotid artery thickness in adult patients?
Observational (n=89)
Does multidetector row computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) agree with color Doppler ultrasound (CD-US) in measuring carotid artery thickness in adult patients?
Effect estimate: Pearson r 0.9997 (95% CI 0.9996-0.9998)
Absolute Event Rate: 1.09% vs 1.06%
p-value: p=< 0.01
MDCTA provides highly correlated and agreeable measurements of carotid artery wall thickness compared to the standard CD-US intimae-media thickness.
MDCTA may serve as alternative for carotid thickness assessment; leaves open need for prospective outcome validation.
The increased thickness of the carotid wall >1 mm is a significant predictor of coronary and cerebrovascular diseases. The purpose of our study was to assess the agreement between multidetector row computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) in measuring carotid artery wall thickness (CAWT) and color Doppler ultrasound (CD-US) in measuring intimae-media thickness (IMT). Eighty-nine patients (aged 35-81) were prospectively analyzed using a 64-detector MDCTA and a CD-US scanner. Continuous data were described as the mean value ± standard deviation, and were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. A p value <0.05 was considered significant. Bland-Altman statistics were employed to measure the agreement between MDCTA and CD-US. CAWT ranged from 0.62 to 1.60 mm, with a mean value of 1.09 mm. IMT ranged from 0.60 to 1.55 mm, with a mean value of 1.06 mm. We observed an excellent agreement between CD-US and MDCTA in the evaluation of the common carotid artery thickness, with a bias between methods of 0.029 mm (which is a highly statistically important difference of absolute values [t = 43.289; p < 0.01] obtained by paired T test), and limits of agreement from 0.04 to 0.104. Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.9997 (95% CI 0.9996-0.9998; p < 0.01). We conclude that there is an excellent correlation between CAWT and IMT measurements obtained with the MDCTA and CD-US.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Savić et al. (2011) reported an observational. Multidetector row computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) vs. Color Doppler ultrasound (CD-US) was evaluated on Agreement in carotid artery thickness measurement (Pearson r 0.9997, 95% CI 0.9996-0.9998, p=< 0.01). Multidetector row computed tomography angiography showed excellent agreement with color Doppler ultrasound for measuring carotid artery thickness (Pearson r 0.9997; 95% CI 0.9996-0.9998; p<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: