Key result
The Ivy bleeding time method demonstrated minimal differences in sensitivity and specificity compared to Simplate II methods, but was preferred due to lower costs and less patient burden.
Why the study?
Does the Simplate II method improve sensitivity and specificity compared to the Ivy method for measuring bleeding time?
Population
72 healthy volunteers and 62 patients receiving oral anticoagulants (total n=134)
Comparison
Simplate II bleeding time method vs Ivy bleeding time method
Design
RCT, Randomized, Double blinding was maintained throughout the study
Authors
Loading...
Supports preferring Ivy bleeding time in practice; confirms comparable diagnostic performance to Simplate II with lower cost and burden.
RCT (n=134)
Double-blind
Randomized
Does the Simplate II method improve sensitivity and specificity compared to the Ivy method for measuring bleeding time?
The Ivy bleeding time method is preferred over Simplate II methods due to similar diagnostic performance but lower cost and less patient burden.
Šrámek et al. (1992) conducted an RCT in Healthy volunteers and patients on oral anticoagulants (n=134). Ivy bleeding time method vs. Simplate II method (horizontal and vertical) was evaluated on Sensitivity, specificity, costs, and patient burden. The Ivy bleeding time method demonstrated minimal differences in sensitivity and specificity compared to Simplate II methods, but was preferred due to lower costs and less patient burden.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: