Key result
The echoSHOCK ultrasound protocol demonstrated higher agreement with an expert panel for diagnosing the cause of shock compared to routine workup (kappa 0.88 vs 0.33).
Why the study?
Early identification of the cause of shock improves prognosis, motivating evaluation of the diagnostic performance of an ultrasound protocol (echoSHOCK) in the emergency department.
Does the echoSHOCK protocol improve diagnostic agreement with an expert panel for the cause of shock in adult patients with undifferentiated shock in the ED compared to routine workup?
Observational (n=85)
Yes
Does the echoSHOCK protocol improve diagnostic agreement with an expert panel for the cause of shock in adult patients with undifferentiated shock in the ED compared to routine workup?
Effect estimate: Kappa 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.93)
The use of a goal-directed ultrasound protocol (echoSHOCK) significantly improves diagnostic accuracy and physician confidence in determining the cause of undifferentiated shock in the emergency department.
May improve diagnostic agreement for undifferentiated ED shock; hypothesis-generating, requires RCTs before practice change.
BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: Early identification of the cause of shock is associated with better prognosis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the performances of an ultrasound protocol (echoSHOCK) to diagnose the cause of shock in the emergency department (ED). DESIGN, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a prospective study performed in two EDs. Included patients were older than 18 years admitted with shock. After routine workup strategy, the suspected cause of shock and the planned treatment were reported. The echoSHOCK protocol, using only B mode, was then performed. After performing echoSHOCK, the investigator reported the same two items. INTERVENTION: echoSHOCK protocol that assessed: compressive pericardial effusion (tamponade), right ventricle dilatation and flattening of the septum, left ventricle dimension and systolic function, indices of hypovolemia. OUTCOMES MEASURE AND ANALYSIS: We defined four different causes for shock (tamponade, acute cor pulmonale, cardiogenic and hypovolemia). The primary endpoint was the degree of agreement of the routine workup and echoSHOCK with an expert panel. MAIN RESULTS: 85 patients [mean age of 73 (14) years] were included. Kappa coefficients between routine strategy and echoSHOCK for the cause of shock, with the expert panel were 0.33 (95% CI, 0.26-0.4) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.83-0.93), respectively. Likewise, for the planned treatment, kappa were 0.21 (95% CI, 0.14-0.28) and 0.9 (95% CI, 0.85-0.94), respectively. The physician's confidence increased from 3.9 (2.1) before echoSHOCK to 9.3 (1.1) after, (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study suggested that echoSHOCK significantly increased the ability to determine the cause of undifferentiated shock in the ED.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leroux et al. (2021) conducted an observational in nontraumatic undifferentiated shock (n=85). echoSHOCK ultrasound protocol vs. routine workup strategy was evaluated on degree of agreement of the routine workup and echoSHOCK with an expert panel for the cause of shock (Kappa 0.88, 95% CI 0.83-0.93). The echoSHOCK ultrasound protocol demonstrated higher agreement with an expert panel for diagnosing the cause of shock compared to routine workup (kappa 0.88 vs 0.33).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: