Key result
Preoperative chemoradiotherapy improved pathological complete response and R0 resection rates compared to preoperative radiotherapy in 3100 patients, but increased grade III/IV adverse reactions.
Why the study?
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of preoperative radiotherapy combined with surgery versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy combined with surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer.
Does preoperative chemoradiotherapy compared to preoperative radiotherapy improve outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer?
Meta-Analysis (n=3,100)
Does preoperative chemoradiotherapy compared to preoperative radiotherapy improve outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer?
Preoperative chemoradiotherapy provides better oncological outcomes than preoperative radiotherapy alone for advanced rectal cancer, albeit with higher toxicity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports preoperative CRT over RT alone in locally advanced rectal cancer; strengthens Level 1 evidence for improved local outcomes despite higher toxicity.
OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) combined with surgery and preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) combined with surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched to collect published randomized controlled trials of preoperative radiotherapy or preoperative CRT combined with surgery for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer. Studies were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, and quality was evaluated; RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS: In total, 7 related studies involving 3100 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were evaluated. The pathological complete response rate, negative lymph node rate, R0 resection rate, and incidence of grade III/IV adverse reactions were lower in the RT group than in the CRT group. In the absence of postoperative chemotherapy, the 5-year local recurrence rate of RT was higher than that of CRT, but there was no significant difference between the groups among those who underwent postoperative chemotherapy. Moreover, there was no significant difference between the groups with regard to the 5-year survival rate, anal-preserving rate, or incidence of anastomotic leakage. CONCLUSION: Preoperative CRT is better than preoperative RT for the treatment of advanced rectal cancer, though the adverse reaction rate is higher.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in locally advanced rectal cancer (n=3,100). Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) combined with surgery vs. Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) combined with surgery was evaluated on Pathological complete response rate, negative lymph node rate, R0 resection rate, and incidence of grade III/IV adverse reactions. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy improved pathological complete response and R0 resection rates compared to preoperative radiotherapy in 3100 patients, but increased grade III/IV adverse reactions.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: