Key result
A sliding scale diuretic titration protocol significantly reduced emergency department visits at 3 months compared to usual care (3% vs 23%, P=0.015) in patients with heart failure.
Why the study?
Does a patient-directed flexible diuretic titration protocol improve exercise tolerance, quality of life, and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure?
RCT (n=66)
Does a patient-directed flexible diuretic titration protocol improve exercise tolerance, quality of life, and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure?
Absolute Event Rate: 3% vs 23%
p-value: p=0.015
A patient-directed sliding scale diuretic titration protocol significantly improves exercise tolerance and quality of life while reducing emergency department visits in patients with heart failure.
Supports implementation of sliding-scale diuretic titration in HF outpatients; extends self-management evidence to flexible dosing protocols.
Patients with heart failure (HF) are often instructed to temporarily adjust their diuretic dose. This approach has become routine in some HF management programs; however, no study has specifically examined the effects of a patient-directed flexible diuretic protocol. For the purposes of this study, patients were randomized into a usual care (UC) group (n = 31) or a flexible diuretic titration (DT) group (n = 35). The DT group completed a 6-item diuretic titration protocol once a day, for 3 months. The 6-minute walk distance, plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-BNP), plasma norepinephrine (NE), and quality of life (QOL) were measured at baseline and at 3 months. Hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, and mortality rates were measured at 3 months. Compared to baseline, at 3 months, there was a significant increase in the DT group's 6-minute walk distance (646 +/- 60 ft vs 761 +/- 61 ft, P = .01) and total QOL score (53 +/- 5 vs 38 +/- 5, P = .001), whereas these parameters remained unchanged within the UC group. There were significantly less ED visits in the DT group compared with those in the UC group (3% vs 23%, P = .015). No differences were found between the groups in HF-related hospitalizations or mortality. Within both groups, no differences were found between baseline and 3-month NE or NT-BNP plasma values. Patients with heart failure who used a sliding scale diuretic titration protocol had significant improvements in their exercise tolerance and QOL, had fewer ED visits, and had no change in plasma NE or NT-BNP levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prasun et al. (2005) conducted an RCT in Heart failure (n=66). Flexible diuretic titration protocol vs. Usual care was evaluated on Emergency department (ED) visits (p=0.015). A sliding scale diuretic titration protocol significantly reduced emergency department visits at 3 months compared to usual care (3% vs 23%, P=0.015) in patients with heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: