Key result
Three-dimensional low dose contrast-enhanced peripheral MR venography depicted venous anatomy in all 5 subjects, providing shorter acquisition times and sharper images than 2D TOF.
Why the study?
Does 3D low dose contrast-enhanced peripheral MR venography improve venous imaging compared to 2D time-of-flight technique in subjects?
Population
5 subjects undergoing peripheral MR venography
Comparison
Three-dimensional low dose contrast-enhanced… vs Two-dimensional time-of-flight technique
Design
Case_series
Authors
Loading...
May support faster peripheral MR venography in select patients; leaves open clinical utility pending larger validation studies.
Observational (n=5)
Does 3D low dose contrast-enhanced peripheral MR venography improve venous imaging compared to 2D time-of-flight technique in subjects?
3D low dose contrast-enhanced peripheral MR venography provides faster and sharper venous imaging compared to 2D time-of-flight techniques, holding promise for detecting venous thrombosis.
Li et al. (1998) reported an observational. Three-dimensional low dose contrast-enhanced peripheral MR venography vs. Two-dimensional (2D) time-of-flight (TOF) technique was evaluated on Depiction of venous anatomy, acquisition time, and image sharpness. Three-dimensional low dose contrast-enhanced peripheral MR venography depicted venous anatomy in all 5 subjects, providing shorter acquisition times and sharper images than 2D TOF.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: