Key result
Retrograde PCI for coronary chronic total occlusion was associated with similar long-term risk of all-cause death compared to antegrade PCI alone (adjusted HR 1.06; 95% CI 0.75-1.49; p=0.745).
Why the study?
The study was conducted to assess the long-term clinical outcomes of coronary chronic total occlusion lesions treated with retrograde PCI compared with antegrade PCI alone.
Does retrograde PCI compared to antegrade PCI alone affect long-term outcomes in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion?
Population
842 consecutive patients (928 CTO lesions) undergoing PCI
Comparison
Retrograde PCI for at least one CTO vs antegrade PCI alone
Design
Cohort study
Follow-up
Median 7.7 (interquartile range 5.6-8.7) years
Authors
Loading...
May warrant caution selecting retrograde CTO PCI in complex lesions; leaves open whether long-term outcomes differ from antegrade alone.
Cohort (n=842)
Does retrograde PCI compared to antegrade PCI alone affect long-term outcomes in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion?
Hazard Ratio: 1.06 (95% CI 0.75–1.49)
p-value: p=0.745
Retrograde CTO PCI does not lead to worse long-term outcomes compared to antegrade PCI alone, despite an increased risk of periprocedural myocardial infarction and coronary perforation.
Tanaka et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Coronary chronic total occlusion (n=842). Retrograde percutaneous coronary intervention vs. Antegrade PCI alone was evaluated on All-cause death (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.75-1.49, p=0.745). Retrograde PCI for coronary chronic total occlusion was associated with similar long-term risk of all-cause death compared to antegrade PCI alone (adjusted HR 1.06; 95% CI 0.75-1.49; p=0.745).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: