Key result
Left ventricular mechanical activity was present in both VF and PEA, with low-frequency VF exhibiting a significantly longer time to asystole compared to high-frequency VF and PEA.
Why the study?
Does the type of induced cardiac arrest (VF vs PEA) affect the pattern and duration of left ventricular mechanical activity in a porcine model?
Does the type of induced cardiac arrest (VF vs PEA) affect the pattern and duration of left ventricular mechanical activity in a porcine model?
In a porcine model of cardiac arrest, left ventricular mechanical activity persists during both VF and PEA, with VF exhibiting distinct high- and low-frequency patterns that correlate with time to asystole.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LV mechanical activity persists in VF/PEA; leaves open human translation from this porcine model.
We conducted an experimental study to evaluate the presence of coordinated left ventricular mechanical myocardial activity (LVMA) in two types of experimentally induced cardiac arrest: ventricular fibrillation (VF) and pulseless electrical activity (PEA). Twenty anesthetized domestic pigs were randomized 1:1 either to induction of VF or PEA. They were left in nonresuscitated cardiac arrest until the cessation of LVMA and microcirculation. Surface ECG, presence of LVMA by transthoracic echocardiography and sublingual microcirculation were recorded. One minute after induction of cardiac arrest, LVMA was identified in all experimental animals. In the PEA group, rate of LVMA was of 106+/-12/min. In the VF group, we identified two patterns of LVMA. Six animals exhibited contractions of high frequency (VFhigh group), four of low frequency (VFlow group) (334+/-12 vs. 125+/-32/min, p<0.001). A time from cardiac arrest induction to asystole (19.2+/-7.2 vs. 7.3+/-2.2 vs. 8.3+/-5.5 min, p=0.003), cessation of LVMA (11.3+/-5.6 vs. 4.4+/-0.4 vs. 7.4+/-2.9 min, p=0.027) and cessation of microcirculation (25.3+/-12.6 vs. 13.4+/-2.4 vs. 23.2+/-8.7 min, p=0.050) was significantly longer in VFlow group than in VFhigh and PEA group, respectively. Thus, LVMA is present in both VF and PEA type of induced cardiac arrest and moreover, VF may exhibit various patterns of LVMA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Škulec et al. (2018) studied Experimental cardiac arrest (n=20). Ventricular fibrillation (VF) induction vs. Pulseless electrical activity (PEA) induction was evaluated on Time from cardiac arrest induction to asystole (VFlow vs VFhigh vs PEA) (p=0.003). Left ventricular mechanical activity was present in both VF and PEA, with low-frequency VF exhibiting a significantly longer time to asystole compared to high-frequency VF and PEA.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: