Key result
Epicardial pacemaker systems had high complication rates requiring lead replacement compared to a 9% rate with endocardial systems.
Why the study?
Do epicardial pacemaker systems have higher complication rates compared to endocardial systems in patients requiring permanent pacing?
Observational (n=457)
No
Do epicardial pacemaker systems have higher complication rates compared to endocardial systems in patients requiring permanent pacing?
Epicardial pacemaker systems are associated with significantly higher long-term complication rates compared to endocardial systems, supporting the routine use of endocardial pacing.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Epicardial systems were associated with higher lead replacement rates; leaves open optimal selection pending randomized trials.
In the last ten years (1970-1980) 457 patients underwent permanent pacemaker insertion in the Brompton Hospital. Our practice has been somewhat atypical in that the majority of these patients had epicardial leads, initially using a Cordis intramural sutured electrode (85 patients), and subsequently a Medtronic sutureless electrode (274 patients). Our initial experience with these electrodes was satisfactory, but more recently it has become apparent that the long-term morbidity and complication rate is high. The respective complication rates being 25% and 18% for sutured and sutureless epicardial electrodes. In this study, lead complications were defined as those requiring lead replacement, and problems most commonly encountered were high voltage threshold, infection, and lead fracture. Unless there are specific indications for epicardial pacing it is now our policy to treat patients requiring permanent pacing with endocardial systems. Our complication rate with this technique (90 patients) is significantly lower (9%).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oldershaw et al. (1982) conducted an observational in Permanent pacemaker insertion (n=457). Epicardial pacemaker systems vs. Endocardial pacemaker systems was evaluated on Lead complications requiring lead replacement. Epicardial pacemaker systems had high complication rates requiring lead replacement compared to a 9% rate with endocardial systems.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: