Key result
Amlodipine use in a 71-year-old male caused symptomatic bradycardia (heart rate in the 40s) that resolved to baseline levels within 24 hours of discontinuing the drug.
Why the study?
Amlodipine is well known to be vasoselective with minimal cardiac tissue effects, but recent literature has reported rare cases of associated symptomatic bradycardia.
Case Report (n=1)
No
Amlodipine, a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker typically considered vasoselective, can rarely cause clinically significant symptomatic bradycardia that resolves upon discontinuation.
May prompt amlodipine consideration in unexplained bradycardia; single case leaves open causality and incidence.
Amlodipine is a calcium channel blocker that is well known to be vasoselective, thereby having minimal effects in cardiac tissue. However, recent literature have reported cases of symptomatic bradycardia associated with amlodipine use. We present a case of an otherwise healthy 71-year-old male who was found to have symptomatic bradycardia while taking amlodipine. He underwent comprehensive evaluation including an exercise stress echocardiogram during which he demonstrated chronotropic competence. Amlodipine was discontinued with return of his heart rate to baseline levels after 24 hours. There is a very low reported incidence of amlodipine-induced bradycardia (0.89% of cases). Despite its infrequency, it is important to recognize amlodipine-induced bradycardia as simply discontinuing the drug will lead to complete resolution of symptoms. Failure to recognize this side effect may lead to unnecessary healthcare costs and negatively impact patient outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tu et al. (2020) conducted a case report in Symptomatic bradycardia (n=1). Amlodipine was evaluated on Resolution of bradycardia. Amlodipine use in a 71-year-old male caused symptomatic bradycardia (heart rate in the 40s) that resolved to baseline levels within 24 hours of discontinuing the drug.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: