Why the study?
Does amlodipine reduce blood pressure and total peripheral resistance without compromising cardiac pump function in patients with essential hypertension?
Does amlodipine reduce blood pressure and total peripheral resistance without compromising cardiac pump function in patients with essential hypertension?
Long-term amlodipine therapy effectively lowers blood pressure through reduced peripheral resistance while preserving cardiac pump function at rest and during exercise.
Supports amlodipine's vasodilatory BP effect with preserved output in hypertension; leaves open randomized confirmation before practice change.
The long-term haemodynamic responses to amlodipine, a new long-acting calcium antagonist, were studied both at rest and during exercise in 18 patients (mean age 43 years) with essential hypertension. Blood pressure was measured intra-arterially, cardiac output by dye dilution and heart rate by electrocardiogram. After 11 months of treatment with 5-10 mg amlodipine once daily (mean dose 9 mg/day), mean arterial pressure was reduced by 14% sitting at rest. The reduction in blood pressure was associated with a marked reduction in the total peripheral resistance index (TPRI) of 19% (P less than 0.001). Similar responses were seen supine at rest and during 50W, 100W and 150W bicycle exercise. No significant changes were seen in heart rate. There was a slight increase in stroke index, and cardiac index was preserved at rest and during exercise with a slight trend towards an increase. In 10 of the patients, blood pressure was monitored by a portable blood pressure recorder (Accutracker II, Suntech Medical instruments, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA). Blood pressure was well controlled throughout the full 24 h period after one daily dose. In conclusion, amlodipine exerts a clear antihypertensive effect, both at rest and during exercise, through reduction in the TPRI and without a fall in cardiac pump function. No changes in heart rate were seen and there was no tendency for a reduction in the stroke index during 8 min of exercise at 150 W; on the contrary there was a trend towards an increase. The incidence of side-effects was low (ankle oedema in two patients).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lund‐Johansen et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: