Key result
Computed tomographic estimates of adipose tissue weight correlated highly with balance weights of resected tissue in rats (r ≥ 0.99) and mice (r ≥ 0.92) after software adjustment.
Effect estimate: r ≥ 0.99 in rats, r ≥ 0.92 in mice
Computed tomography is a valid, sensitive, and reliable tool for estimating intra-abdominal and subcutaneous adipose tissue weight in rats and mice, particularly useful for longitudinal studies.
Does not alter clinical practice; supports CT for longitudinal adipose quantification in rodent obesity models.
We characterized the accuracy, sensitivity, and reliability of computed tomographic (CT) estimates of intra-abdominal (IA) and subcutaneous (S) adipose tissue (AT) in rats and mice using the Aloka rodent CT. Here, we present the first comparisons of CT estimates of the weights of AT samples ex vivo to balance weights of the same samples, of CT estimates of AT weights in vivo to the weights of resected whole-body AT, and of CT estimates of the weights of pieces of AT inserted IA or S in vivo to the weights of the same pieces ex vivo. CT underestimated AT weight ex vivo by approximately 10%, and correction of the automated categorization of IAAT and SAT by Aloka software was required. After these adjustments, correlations (r) of CT estimates and balance weights of resected AT were > or =0.99 in rats and > or =0.92 in mice. CT was impressively sensitive: the 95% probability range of CT estimates of 10,000 mg AT inserts into rats was +/-780 mg and of 500 mg inserts into mice, +/-20 mg. Scans limited to the abdominal region correlated well (r > 0.90) with whole-body scan measures of IAAT and SAT in rats and with IAAT, but not SAT (r < 0.80), in mice. Sums of IAAT and SAT correlated well with body weight in rats (r > 0.90), but not in mice (r < 0.80). Coefficients of variance (CVs) of duplicate scans were <5%. We conclude that CT is a valid tool for studies of AT weight in rats and mice, especially when rapid throughput or longitudinal measures are desired.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hillebrand et al. (2009) studied Adipose tissue measurement. Computed tomographic (CT) estimates vs. Balance weights was evaluated on Correlation of CT estimates and balance weights of resected adipose tissue (r ≥ 0.99 in rats, r ≥ 0.92 in mice). Computed tomographic estimates of adipose tissue weight correlated highly with balance weights of resected tissue in rats (r ≥ 0.99) and mice (r ≥ 0.92) after software adjustment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: