Key result
In a 5-year Markov model, the MitraClip strategy avoided 276 deaths per 1000 patients with mitral regurgitation ineligible for surgery compared to medical management, with a mean ICER of €20,720.
Why the study?
Is the MitraClip strategy cost-effective compared to medical management in reducing mortality among patients with mitral regurgitation ineligible for surgery?
Is the MitraClip strategy cost-effective compared to medical management in reducing mortality among patients with mitral regurgitation ineligible for surgery?
Effect estimate: 276 deaths avoided
MitraClip therapy may offer a cost-effective alternative to medical management for reducing mortality in patients with mitral regurgitation who are ineligible for surgery.
May support MitraClip cost-effectiveness in high-risk MR from a payer view; leaves open need for broader randomized confirmation.
Introduction Mitral regurgitation is a heart condition resulting from blood flowing from the left ventricle towards the left atrium, increasing the risk of heart failure and mortality. While surgery can greatly reduce these risks, some patients are not eligible, resulting in medication being their only therapeutic alternative. The MitraClip (Abbot Vascular) is a medical device that is percutaneously implanted and designed to eliminate leaking of the mitral valve. Methods The efficacy of the MitraClip strategy vs medical management was assessed using a 4-state Markov model based on the mitral regurgitation grade (mitral regurgitation grade 0, I/II, and III/IV, and death). At each 1-month cycle, patients were or were not hospitalized. The model analyzed a fictional population of 1000 patients over a 5-year period from a national Health Insurance perspective. The primary end-point was the number of deaths avoided. Data from the EVEREST II High Risk Study patients were used along with a literature review. Results At 5 years, among the 1000 patients, 276 deaths were found to be avoidable with the MitraClip strategy. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was €93,363 per death avoided. The annual ICER was calculated to take into consideration excess costs resulting from the MitraClip over the first year (€29,984 vs €8557 for the reference strategy) and the reduction of costs in following years (€3122 for MitraClip vs €8557 for reference strategy). Thus, the mean ICER was calculated to be €20,720 per death avoided. Conclusion The MitraClip is a novel alternative therapy for mitral insufficiency in patients ineligible for surgery that may offer a medico-economic advantage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guérin et al. (2016) studied Mitral regurgitation (n=1,000). MitraClip strategy vs. Medical management was evaluated on Number of deaths avoided (276 deaths avoided). In a 5-year Markov model, the MitraClip strategy avoided 276 deaths per 1000 patients with mitral regurgitation ineligible for surgery compared to medical management, with a mean ICER of €20,720.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: