Key result
Transcatheter mitral repair with MitraClip was associated with lower all-cause mortality compared to medical management (21% vs 42%, p=0.007).
Why the study?
Does transcatheter mitral leaflet repair improve survival and cost-effectiveness compared to medical therapy in heart failure patients with symptomatic moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation?
Observational
Does transcatheter mitral leaflet repair improve survival and cost-effectiveness compared to medical therapy in heart failure patients with symptomatic moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation?
Absolute Event Rate: 21% vs 42%
p-value: p=0.007
In heart failure patients with symptomatic moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation, MitraClip provides a significant survival benefit and is highly cost-effective compared to medical therapy alone.
MitraClip was associated with lower mortality and favorable cost-effectiveness in this cohort; leaves open confirmation by randomized trials before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common valvular heart disorder requiring intervention once it becomes severe. Transcatheter mitral repair with the MitraClip device is a safe and effective therapy for selected patients denied surgery. The authors sought to evaluate the clinical outcomes and economic impact of this therapy compared to medical management in heart-failure patients with symptomatic mitral regurgitation. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study was comprised of two phases; an observational study of patients with heart failure and mitral regurgitation treated with either medical therapy or the MitraClip, and an economic model. Results of the observational study were used to estimate parameters for the decision model, which estimated costs, and benefits in a hypothetical cohort of patients with heart failure and moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation treated with either standard medical therapy or MitraClip. The cohort of patients treated with the MitraClip was propensity matched to a population of heart failure patients, and their outcomes compared. At a mean follow-up of 22 months, all-cause mortality was 21% in the MitraClip cohort and 42% in the medical management cohort (p = .007). The decision model demonstrated that MitraClip increased life expectancy from 1.87-3.60 years and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) from 1.13-2.76 years. The incremental cost was $52,500 Canadian dollars, corresponding to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $32,300.00 per QALY gained. Results were sensitive to the survival benefit. CONCLUSION: In heart failure patients with symptomatic moderate-severe mitral regurgitation, therapy with the MitraClip is associated with superior survival and is cost-effective compared to medical therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asgar et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Heart failure with symptomatic mitral regurgitation. MitraClip vs. Medical management was evaluated on All-cause mortality (p=0.007). Transcatheter mitral repair with MitraClip was associated with lower all-cause mortality compared to medical management (21% vs 42%, p=0.007).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: