Key result
Intact Medtronic and Carpentier Edwards SAV prostheses showed similar durability and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing isolated aortic replacement, with 13-year survival of 53.3% vs 47.5%.
Why the study?
Does the Intact Medtronic prosthesis improve clinical outcomes compared to the Carpentier Edwards SAV prosthesis in patients undergoing isolated aortic replacement?
Cohort (n=215)
Does the Intact Medtronic prosthesis improve clinical outcomes compared to the Carpentier Edwards SAV prosthesis in patients undergoing isolated aortic replacement?
Absolute Event Rate: 53.31% vs 47.47%
Both Intact Medtronic and Carpentier Edwards SAV prostheses provide similar durability and excellent long-term clinical outcomes in elderly patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.
UNLABELLED: We report on 215 consecutive patients with isolated aortic replacement of which 91 received an Intact Medtronic (IM) prosthesis and 124 a Carpentier Edwards SAV. (CE). More than 50% of patients were over 70 years old. Follow-up was complete for 95% of patients. Mean follow-up was 6.04 years (16 days-13 years); a total of 1244 patient-years (IM 6.61years, 590 patient-years, CE 5.95 years, 670 patient-years). RESULTS: the following results are expressed for IM and CE groups respectively. Early mortality: 3.3% and 8.13%. Late mortality: 23 and 27 patients. Survival at 13 years: 53.31+/-7.63% and 47.47+/-7.9%. Major thromboembolism: 0.34% and 0.30% per patient-year. SVD: 0.16% and 0.14% per patient-year. Endocarditis: 0.33% and 0.29%. Re-operation: 0.5% and 0.44%. Over 95% of patients are re-operation free at 13 years. CONCLUSION: Intact and Carpentier valves had similar durability and clinical/hemodynamic results. Both have proved excellent aortic valve substitutes in elderly patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sanchez et al. (2003) conducted a cohort in Isolated aortic replacement (n=215). Intact Medtronic (IM) prosthesis vs. Carpentier Edwards SAV (CE) prosthesis was evaluated on Survival at 13 years. Intact Medtronic and Carpentier Edwards SAV prostheses showed similar durability and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing isolated aortic replacement, with 13-year survival of 53.3% vs 47.5%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: