Key result
Preload recruitable stroke work calculated using intracavitary left ventricular pressure did not differ from calculations using transmural pressure during elevated external cardiac pressures.
Why the study?
Does the calculation of PRSW using LVPic differ from LVPtm during elevated extracardiac pressures in anaesthetised pigs?
Does the calculation of PRSW using LVPic differ from LVPtm during elevated extracardiac pressures in anaesthetised pigs?
Transmural left ventricular pressure does not need to be measured for pressure-volume analysis of systolic function even when external cardiac pressures are elevated.
Simplifies PRSW-based LV systolic assessment in porcine models with elevated extracardiac pressure; leaves open translation to clinical pressure-volume analysis.
BACKGROUND: Variations or disturbances in intrathoracic and extracardiac pressures (ECP) occur in critically ill and anaesthetised patients. There are uncertainties concerning the analysis of left ventricular pressure-volume relationship (LVPVR) and the calculation of systolic function parameters when conducted without reference to transmural left ventricular pressure (LVPtm) in the setting of elevated ECP. METHODS: In 7 anaesthetised adult pigs, we measured LVPVR using conductance volumetry and tip manometry along with measurement of pericardial and other intrathoracic pressures. Experimental pericardial infusion and pleural insufflation were performed. Transient controlled preload reductions were accomplished using balloon occlusion of the inferior vena cava. Preload recruitable stroke work (PRSW) was calculated using both intracavitary left ventricular pressure (LVPic) and LVPtm, and differences were tested for using a paired t-test. RESULTS: The pericardial and pleural interventions produced significant elevations in ECP. No difference in PRSW calculated using LVPic and LVPtm was detected. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that LVPtm need not be measured and included in LVPVR analysis of systolic function when there is significant external cardiac pressure. To be able to employ LVPVR analysis of systolic function without reference to LVPtm is important for simplified application in the clinical setting, particularly when elevated extracardiac pressures are suspected, or have been therapeutically induced, as with continuous positive pressure ventilation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haney et al. (2001) studied this question. Preload recruitable stroke work (PRSW) calculated using intracavitary left ventricular pressure (LVPic) vs. PRSW calculated using transmural left ventricular pressure (LVPtm) was evaluated on Difference in preload recruitable stroke work (PRSW). Preload recruitable stroke work calculated using intracavitary left ventricular pressure did not differ from calculations using transmural pressure during elevated external cardiac pressures.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: