Key result
Concomitant mitral valve repair during CF-LVAD implantation was not a significant independent predictor of survival (OR 0.4; 95% CI 0.8-1.5; P=0.2).
Cohort (n=78)
No
Odds Ratio: 0.4 (95% CI 0.8–1.5)
p-value: p=0.2
May support mitral repair in severe MR at CF-LVAD implantation; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
OBJECTIVES: Mitral regurgitation (MR) is common in patients with end-stage heart failure. We assessed the effect of performing concomitant mitral valve repair during continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation in patients with severe preoperative MR. METHODS: We performed a single-centre, retrospective review of all patients who underwent CF-LVAD implantation between December 1999 and December 2013 (n = 469). Patients with severe preoperative MR (n = 78) were identified and then stratified according to whether they underwent concomitant valve repair. Univariate and survival analyses were performed, and multivariable regression was used to determine predictors of survival. RESULTS: Of the 78 patients with severe MR, 21 underwent valve repair at the time of CF-LVAD implantation (repair group) and 57 did not (non-repair group). A comparison of the 2 groups showed significant differences between groups: INTERMACS I 16.985 vs 9.52%, (P = 0.039), cardiopulmonary bypass time 82.09 vs 109.4 min (P = 0.0042) and the use of HeartMate II 63.16 vs 100% (P = 0.001). Survival analysis suggested trends towards improved survival and a lower incidence of heart failure-related readmissions in the repair group. Multivariable regression analysis showed no significant independent predictors of survival (mitral valve repair: odds ratio 0.4, 95% confidence interval 0.8-1.5; P = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lack of statistical significance, trends towards improved survival and a lower incidence of heart failure events suggest that mitral valve repair may be beneficial in patients undergoing CF-LVAD implantation. Given the known relationship between severe MR and mortality, further study is encouraged to confirm the value of mitral valve repair in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sandoval et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in End-stage heart failure with severe mitral regurgitation (n=78). Concomitant mitral valve repair vs. No concomitant mitral valve repair was evaluated on Survival (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.8-1.5, p=0.2). Concomitant mitral valve repair during CF-LVAD implantation was not a significant independent predictor of survival (OR 0.4; 95% CI 0.8-1.5; P=0.2).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: