Key result
The 12 cc Penn State pediatric pulsatile VAD with Bjork-Shiley monostrut valves produced a more intense inlet jet, leading to better recirculation and wall washing than CarboMedics valves.
Why the study?
Do Bjork-Shiley monostrut tilting disk valves improve fluid dynamics and wall washing compared to CarboMedics bileaflet valves in a pediatric pulsatile VAD model?
Do Bjork-Shiley monostrut tilting disk valves improve fluid dynamics and wall washing compared to CarboMedics bileaflet valves in a pediatric pulsatile VAD model?
In a pediatric pulsatile VAD model, Bjork-Shiley monostrut tilting disk valves provided superior fluid dynamics and wall washing compared to CarboMedics bileaflet valves, potentially reducing thrombosis risk.
May inform valve selection for better washout in pediatric VAD models; leaves open clinical thrombosis impact.
The mortality rate for infants awaiting a heart transplant is 40% because of the extremely limited number of donor organs. Ventricular assist devices (VADs), a common bridge-to-transplant solution in adults, are becoming a viable option for pediatric patients. A major obstacle faced by VAD designers is thromboembolism. Previous studies have shown that the interrelated flow characteristics necessary for the prevention of thrombosis in a pulsatile VAD are a strong inlet jet, a late diastolic recirculating flow, and a wall shear rate greater than 500 s(-1). Particle image velocimetry was used to compare the flow fields in the chamber of the 12 cc Penn State pediatric pulsatile VAD using two mechanical heart valves: Bjork-Shiley monostrut (BSM) tilting disk valves and CarboMedics (CM) bileaflet valves. In conjunction with the flow evaluation, wall shear data were calculated and analyzed to help quantify wall washing. The major orifice inlet jet of the device containing BSM valves was more intense, which led to better recirculation and wall washing than the three jets produced by the CM valves. Regurgitation through the CM valve served as a significant hindrance to the development of the rotational flow.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cooper et al. (2008) studied Infants awaiting a heart transplant. Bjork-Shiley monostrut (BSM) tilting disk valves vs. CarboMedics (CM) bileaflet valves was evaluated on Flow fields, recirculation, and wall washing. The 12 cc Penn State pediatric pulsatile VAD with Bjork-Shiley monostrut valves produced a more intense inlet jet, leading to better recirculation and wall washing than CarboMedics valves.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: