Key result
The presence of a novel 132-bp exon in the human maxi-K channel attenuates its sensitivity to voltage and intracellular Ca2+ in transfected fibroblasts.
Identification of a novel 132-bp exon in the human maxi-K channel that modulates its sensitivity to voltage and calcium, providing a potential mechanism for regulating cell excitability in smooth muscle.
This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The large-conductance Ca2+-activated voltage-dependent K+ channel (maxi-K channel) induces a significant repolarizing current that buffers cell excitability. This channel can derive its diversity by alternative splicing of its transcript-producing isoforms that differ in their sensitivity to voltage and intracellular Ca2+. We have identified a novel 132-bp exon of the maxi-K channel from human myometrial cells that encodes 44 amino acids within the first intracellular loop of the channel protein. Distribution analysis reveals that this exon is expressed predominantly in human smooth muscle tissues with the highest abundance in the uterus and aorta and resembles the previously reported distribution of the total maxi-K channel transcript. Single-channel K+ current measurements in fibroblasts transfected with the maxi-K channel containing this novel 132-bp exon demonstrate that the presence of this insert attenuates the sensitivity to voltage and intracellular Ca2+. Alternative splicing to introduce this 132-bp exon into the maxi-K channel may elicit another mode to modulate cell excitability.
Attenuates maxi-K sensitivity in vitro; leaves open its role in smooth muscle excitability regulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Korovkina et al. (2001) studied this question. Novel 132-bp exon of the maxi-K channel was evaluated on Sensitivity to voltage and intracellular Ca2+. The presence of a novel 132-bp exon in the human maxi-K channel attenuates its sensitivity to voltage and intracellular Ca2+ in transfected fibroblasts.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: