Key result
Left paratracheal pressure did not significantly affect peak systolic velocity in the left common carotid artery (mean difference -15.30 cm/s; 95% CI -31.09 to 0.48; p=0.14).
Why the study?
Left paratracheal pressure seals the oesophagus, but proximity to the left common carotid artery raises concerns about hemodynamic effects on carotid blood flow.
Does left paratracheal pressure affect carotid blood flow in healthy adults?
Observational (n=47)
Does left paratracheal pressure affect carotid blood flow in healthy adults?
Left paratracheal pressure does not significantly affect carotid blood flow in healthy individuals without carotid pathology.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LPP shows no significant carotid flow effect in healthy volunteers; leaves open safety assessment in patients with carotid pathology.
Introduction Gautier et al. demonstrated that a compression in the left paratracheal region (left paratracheal pressure, LPP) can be used to seal the oesophagus. However, at this level, the left common carotid artery is very close to the carotid that could be affected during the manipulation. This study aimed to assess the hemodynamic effects of LPP on the carotid blood flow. Methods We prospectively included 47 healthy adult volunteers. We excluded pregnant women and people with anomalies of the carotid arteries. The common and internal carotid arteries were preliminarily studied with ultrasounds to exclude atheromatous plaques or vascular malformation. A planimetry of the common and internal carotid arteries was performed. Doppler echography served to measure the peak systolic (PSV) and end‐diastolic velocities (EDV) in the common and internal carotid arteries. All measurements were repeated while applying LPP. Results Forty‐seven participants were enrolled (32 women; mean [SD] age: 42 [13] years). The mean PSV difference [95% CI] in the left common carotid artery before and after LPP at the group level was −15.30 [−31.09 to 0.48] cm s−1 (p = .14). The mean surface difference [95% CI] in the left common carotid artery before and after LPP was 24.52 [6.11–42.92] mm2 (p = .11). Similarly, the same surface at the level of the left internal carotid artery changed by −18.89 [−51.59 to 13.80] mm2 after LPP (p = .58). Conclusions Our results suggest that LPP does not have a significant effect on carotid blood flow in individuals without a carotid pathology. However, the safety of the manoeuvre should be evaluated in patients at risk of carotid anomalies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Javillier et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Healthy adult volunteers (n=47). Left paratracheal pressure (LPP) vs. Before LPP was evaluated on Peak systolic velocity (PSV) difference in the left common carotid artery (MD -15.30, 95% CI -31.09 to 0.48, p=0.14). Left paratracheal pressure did not significantly affect peak systolic velocity in the left common carotid artery (mean difference -15.30 cm/s; 95% CI -31.09 to 0.48; p=0.14).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: