Key result
Women listed as Status 1 for heart transplantation had a lower rate of transplantation compared to men (adjusted HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.62-0.88; P<0.001).
Why the study?
Waitlist and heart transplantation outcomes by sex among patients in the highest urgency strata (Status 1) since the 2018 United States allocation system change were unknown.
Does female sex reduce the rate of heart transplantation in adult Status 1 waitlist candidates?
Cohort (n=1,120)
Yes
Does female sex reduce the rate of heart transplantation in adult Status 1 waitlist candidates?
Hazard Ratio: 0.74 (95% CI 0.62–0.88)
p-value: p=<0.001
Women listed as the highest priority (Status 1) for heart transplantation face a significantly lower likelihood of receiving a transplant and a higher risk of death or clinical deterioration on the waitlist compared to men.
Women listed Status 1 had worse waitlist outcomes than men; leaves open whether temporary MCS safety differs by sex and requires prospective study.
Background: While sex differences in heart transplantation (HT) waitlist mortality have been previously described, waitlist and HT outcomes by sex of patients in the highest urgency strata (Status 1) since implementation of the 2018 allocation system change in the United States are unknown. We hypothesized that women listed as Status 1 may have worse outcomes due to adverse events on temporary mechanical circulatory support. Methods: The analysis included adult, single-organ HT waitlist candidates listed as Status 1 at any time while listed, after the HT allocation system change (from October 18, 2018 through March 31, 2022). The primary outcome was the rate of HT by sex, assessed using multivariable competing risk analysis where waitlist removal for death or clinical deterioration was the competing event. Post-HT survival by sex of waitlist candidates transplanted as a Status 1 was also compared. Results: Of 1120 Status 1 waitlist candidates (23.8% women), women had a lower rate of HT compared to men (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.62–0.88]; P <0.001) and a higher rate of delisting for death or medical unsuitability (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.05–2.09]; P =0.026). Calculated panel reactive antibody did not account for all the harm observed. Post-HT survival of Status 1 candidates by sex was similar (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.62–2.06]; P =0.70). Conclusions: Women have a lower rate of HT and higher rate of delisting for death or clinical deterioration at the highest urgent status, which appears to be mediated but not fully explained by calculated panel reactive antibody levels. Further investigation into the safety profile of temporary mechanical circulatory support devices in women is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
DeFilippis et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Heart transplantation waitlist candidates (Status 1) (n=1,120). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on Rate of heart transplantation (adjusted HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.88, p=<0.001). Women listed as Status 1 for heart transplantation had a lower rate of transplantation compared to men (adjusted HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.62-0.88; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: