Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
I develop a theodicy (Non-Identity Theodicy) that begins with the recognition that we owe our existence to great and varied evils. I develop two versions of this theodicy, with the result that some version is available to the theist regardless of her assumptions about the existence and nature of free will. My defense of Non-Identity Theodicy is aided by an analogy between divine creation and human procreation. I argue that if one af rms the morality of vol- untary human procreation, one should af rm the morality of divine creation; conversely, deny- ing the morality of divine creation commits one to denying the morality of human procreation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vince R. Vitale (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: