Key result
Duplex ultrasonography correctly identified 86% of DVTs diagnosed on venography overall, and demonstrated 95% sensitivity and 100% specificity for femoral vein DVT.
Why the study?
Does duplex ultrasonography scanning accurately diagnose deep venous thrombosis compared to venography in patients with suspected DVT?
Cross-Sectional (n=65)
Does duplex ultrasonography scanning accurately diagnose deep venous thrombosis compared to venography in patients with suspected DVT?
Duplex ultrasonography is highly accurate for diagnosing femoropopliteal DVT and can replace venography as the standard diagnostic method.
Supports duplex ultrasonography for femoral DVT diagnosis; leaves open replacement of venography pending prospective validation.
Sixty-five patients with suspected deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in 68 limbs were entered consecutively into a study to compare venography with duplex ultrasonography scanning. Both tests were performed on 64 limbs, venography being contraindicated in four. Overall, duplex scanning correctly identified 86 per cent of DVTs diagnosed on venography and correctly excluded 80 per cent with negative venograms. Nearly all errors arose in the diagnosis of calf DVT. In the femoral vein duplex scanning had a specificity of 100 per cent and a sensitivity of 95 per cent. In addition, duplex scanning provided data on the limb not undergoing venography. Of 55 limbs that underwent bilateral duplex scanning, five had thrombus in the femoropopliteal segment and a negative contralateral venogram. In addition, three Baker's cysts were diagnosed. Duplex scanning can be used in patients in whom venography is contraindicated and may also provide information about the contralateral limb. We regard femoropopliteal duplex scanning as sufficiently accurate that treatment can be initiated on the basis of the scan. Duplex scanning should replace venography as the standard method of diagnosing femoropopliteal DVT; radiographic studies should now be required only when the scan result is in doubt.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mitchell et al. (1991) conducted a cross-sectional in suspected deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (n=65). Duplex ultrasonography vs. Venography was evaluated on Correct identification of DVT (sensitivity) and exclusion of DVT (specificity). Duplex ultrasonography correctly identified 86% of DVTs diagnosed on venography overall, and demonstrated 95% sensitivity and 100% specificity for femoral vein DVT.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: