Key result
Viscoelastic hemostatic analyzers provided a fast, portable alternative to D-dimers for detecting in vitro fibrinolysis, with high sensitivity and specificity.
Why the study?
Fibrinolysis is associated with poor outcomes without early, effective treatment, necessitating evaluation and comparison of fibrinolysis detection capabilities across different viscoelastic hemostatic analyzers, assays, and D-dimers.
Do viscoelastic hemostatic analyzers provide comparable sensitivity and specificity to D-dimers for detecting in vitro fibrinolysis?
Population
In vitro samples tested across TEG6s (n = 160), TEG5000 (n = 140), ROTEM Sigma (n = 160), and ROTEM Delta (n = 140)
Comparison
Different viscoelastic hemostatic analyzers and assays vs D-dimers under standardized in vitro conditions
Design
In vitro comparative laboratory study
Authors
Loading...
VHA comparisons for tPA-induced fibrinolysis detection warrant cautious interpretation; leaves open clinical utility pending prospective validation.
Do viscoelastic hemostatic analyzers provide comparable sensitivity and specificity to D-dimers for detecting in vitro fibrinolysis?
Viscoelastic hemostatic analyzers can serve as a fast, effective, and portable alternative to D-dimers for the rapid detection of fibrinolysis.
Dias et al. (2021) studied Fibrinolysis (n=300). Viscoelastic hemostatic analyzers (VHA) vs. D-dimers was evaluated on Fibrinolysis detection capability. Viscoelastic hemostatic analyzers provided a fast, portable alternative to D-dimers for detecting in vitro fibrinolysis, with high sensitivity and specificity.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: