Key result
Adopting static blood pressure cutoffs of 120/80 mmHg for children and 130/80 mmHg for adolescents simplifies pediatric hypertension screening with comparable performance to complex percentile tables.
Why the study?
Pediatric hypertension is often undiagnosed partly due to reliance on complex blood pressure percentile-based tables, while existing simplified tools yield false positives or remain inconvenient.
Do static blood pressure cutoffs simplify pediatric hypertension screening while maintaining comparable performance to complex percentile-based tables?
Do static blood pressure cutoffs simplify pediatric hypertension screening while maintaining comparable performance to complex percentile-based tables?
Adopting static blood pressure cutoffs of 120/80 mmHg for children and 130/80 mmHg for adolescents simplifies pediatric hypertension screening while maintaining predictive value for cardiovascular damage.
Static cutoffs may simplify pediatric hypertension screening; leaves open whether they improve detection or outcomes versus percentile tables.
BACKGROUND: The importance of routine hypertension screening in children and adolescents is now well recognized. However, it is often undiagnosed in clinical practice, partly due to the reliance on a complex blood pressure (BP) percentile-based table with hundreds of cutoffs by age, sex, and height. MAIN TEXT: Many studies have explored simplified tools for screening hypertension in children and adolescents, such as simplified formulas, simplified BP tables by age and sex group, by age group, or by height group, and the BP to height ratio. Nevertheless, validation studies have demonstrated that these simplified tools are prone to yielding many false-positive cases or remain inconvenient to use in primary pediatric care settings and large-scale screening surveys. To address this issue, we propose adopting static BP cutoffs of 120/80 mmHg for children aged 6-12 years and 130/80 mmHg for adolescents aged 13-17 years to simplify the definition of hypertension. Our proposed static BP cutoffs have shown comparable performance to the complex BP percentile-based table in predicting subclinical cardiovascular damage in both childhood and adulthood. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend using static BP cutoffs (120/80 mmHg for children and 130/80 mmHg for adolescents) to facilitate the screening of pediatric hypertension in clinical practice, thereby bridging the gap between perception and action.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2024) conducted a review in Pediatric hypertension. Static blood pressure cutoffs (120/80 mmHg for children, 130/80 mmHg for adolescents) vs. Complex BP percentile-based tables was evaluated. Adopting static blood pressure cutoffs of 120/80 mmHg for children and 130/80 mmHg for adolescents simplifies pediatric hypertension screening with comparable performance to complex percentile tables.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: